|
The current inter-Korean summit was held amid a fever
of enthusiasm of the entire Korean people. How do you
assess its success?
I would say its primary significance can be found in
that it marked a step toward the long-awaited national
unification by the Koreans themselves. National
unification is not only the paramount concern of the
Korean people but also my own will to achieve through
successfully following the teachings of President Kim IL
Sung’s. There is a proverb in Korea: “Well begun is
half done.” It’s time for us to make joint efforts
to bring about Korea’s reunification at the earliest
possible date.
On June 13, you showed exceptionally good hospitality
to President Kim Dae Jung by meeting him at the airport.
It was unprecedented in terms of protocol. Please tell
me what made you do that?
I spontaneously made that decision. As a matter of
fact, Mr. Kim Dae Jung’s image had been not so good
among our people. His image is derived from the negative
information about his words and deeds. For instance, he
has advocated continued U.S. military presence in South
Korea even after the unification has been realized; he
detained a number of South Korean unification activists;
and he failed to take due steps to send our unconverted
long-term prisoners back to us. In contrast, however,
President Kim made a brave decision to come visit
Pyongyang. Therefore, necessity to change such a mood of
the Pyongyang citizens drove me to greet him at the
airport.
What was your impression about President Kim?
The 5-point joint declaration agreed at the current
summit talks is so significant that it may be named a
great charter for national unification. You cannot do
everything at one go. It may take some time, however, we
must put it into practice without fail. I do believe
that President Kim has a firm will and good faith to put
the agreement into action with unwavering attention. ...
I also will do my utmost for its realization.
In South Korea expectations are running high for your
return visit to Seoul. When do you think it will happen?
I would like to make a decision by watching the
subsequent developments in terms of the agreement’s
implementation.
You paid an unofficial visit to China just before the
inter-Korean summit. How do you evaluate China’s
open-door policy?
I feel that it has been having positive effects on
the economic growth. Politics should help raise the
standard living of the people anyway.
Compared to the North-South relations which have made
a ground-breaking progress, the DPRK-US relations seem
to have been at a somewhat stalemate for the moment.
What prospect do you have of improving bilateral ties?
William Perry visited here in his capacity as a U.S.
special envoy. Now the ball is in our court. So we are
going to send a higher-level delegation to the U.S.
soon.
President Kim reportedly claimed during the summit
that an “immediate pullout of the U.S. forces from
South Korea would be difficult in consideration of the
realities” and that both of you arrived at not a
complete agreement but some mutual understanding on this
subject. What do you think of it?
We have urged the U.S. forces to leave South Korea.
However, I don’t expect them to leave soon. The
Americans, before anybody else, should give it
reconsideration of their own accord. They are
responsible for the partitioning of Korea into two
halves. They are accordingly obligated to facilitate its
reunification.
How are you intending to solve the
DPRK-Japanese
relations?
For us, Japan has been long a so-called “nation
close yet far.” We are ready to make our ties with
that country “close and intimate.” We wish an
earlier normalization of relations with Japan, however,
it is up to Tokyo’s decision. At first, instead of
clamoring about what they call “suspicions of
abduction” (of Japanese), Japan should make sincere
and faithful efforts to address the fundamental
questions existing between the two nations such as
resolution of her past history.
Your country has undergone serious economic
difficulties since 1994. How have you spent these hard
times?
During the past five years of hardships, I have been
profoundly distressed to think of the fates of our 20
million people. I wish to express my high gratitude for
the humanitarian assistance received from the peoples of
all over the world including South Korea, the U.S. and
Japan and so forth.
What virtue do you think is essential for a leader?
You can never call anyone a leader who lacks popular
support. No leader is privileged to lord it over the
fellow countrymen as President Kim IL Sung said. A
national leader must labor together with the people.
I suppose you are aware that the current inter-Korean
summit caused a wave of “Kim Jong IL shock” or
“Kim Jong IL syndrome” among the South Korean
people.
I know that my image used to be much negative among
the South Korean people due to floods of distorted
information about me. And after I appeared on TV
screens, I’m sure, they came to know that I am not
like a man with horns on the head.
* At the end of her article Ms. Moon added that
during the 6-hour-long interview the North Korean leader
provided a variety of topics of conversation including
Catholicism and Christianity, hot spas, Italian pizza,
Korean cuisine, and etc., to say nothing of
international relations. “A ‘Kim Jong IL shock’
hit the world. But who changed?,” she raises a
question. “Has he made a make-over debut this time or
remained unchanged? Doesn’t he just look like a
different type of man because we changed our views of
his personality?” “What is clear,” she commented,
“is that we should begin a fresh study of Kim Jong IL
in order to gain a correct understanding of the North
Korean leader.”
|